<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; font</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/tag/font/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 23:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Simple words, simple fonts</title>
		<link>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2012/04/simple-words-simple-fonts/</link>
		<comments>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2012/04/simple-words-simple-fonts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 01:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tashword</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/?p=3856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often suggest using fewer words to make reading your message simple and easy. Roger Dooley, author of Brainfluence, has added a new form of simplicity to effective communications &#8211; simplicity in fonts. Research has shown that ornate fonts make a task appear to be more time-consuming than the same task written in a clearer, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often suggest <a title="Short and sweet" href="http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2010/07/short-and-sweet/">using fewer words</a> to make reading your message simple and easy.</p>
<p>Roger Dooley, <a title="Brainfluence by Roger Dooley" href="http://www.clixGalore.com/PSale.aspx?BID=75135&amp;AfID=70569&amp;AdID=8710&amp;AffDirectURL=thenile.com.au%2fbooks%2fRoger-Dooley%2fBrainfluence%2f9781118113363%2f&amp;LP=www.thenile.com.au" target="_blank">author of Brainfluence</a>, has added a new form of simplicity to effective communications &#8211; <a title="Brain tricks from Roger Dooley" href="http://www.inc.com/caitlin-berens/roger-dooley-brain-tricks.html?nav=linkedin" target="_blank">simplicity in fonts</a>.</p>
<p>Research has shown that ornate fonts make a task appear to be more time-consuming than the same task written in a clearer, simpler font. An ornate font could actually make your products and services seem slow or tedious, which is obviously not an image you want to promote.</p>
<p>Dooley stated that a simpler font will communicate your message better because it is easier to read and looks easier to read (i.e. is more appealing). Just like a simpler message is easier and more appealing.</p>
<p>What do you think &#8211; does a fancy font impact on how you perceive a product or service?</p>
<div id="attachment_3882" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/A-shorter-message-is-more-likely-to-be-read.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-3882 " title="A shorter message is more likely to be read" src="http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/A-shorter-message-is-more-likely-to-be-read-150x150.png" alt="Shorter messages and clearer fonts make writing readable" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Which font is clearer?</p></div>
<p>PS The recommendation is to use a clear font such as Arial for descriptions and instructions.</p>
<fb:like href='http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2012/04/simple-words-simple-fonts/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='recommend' colorscheme='light' font='lucida+grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2012/04/simple-words-simple-fonts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Font sizes&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2008/08/font-sizes/</link>
		<comments>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2008/08/font-sizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tashword</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business tools & events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consistency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readibilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suitable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surfing some of my favourite blogs today, I came across a post by Donna-Marie about choosing suitable fonts. As well as being a good summary of which fonts work well in different media, it reminded me of someone recently asking about using different sized fonts &#8211; and recent experiences of unsuitable font choices.  I remember [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surfing some of my favourite blogs today, I came across a post by Donna-Marie about <a title="Choosing fonts" href="http://smallbusinessdiva.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/what-difference-does-a-font-make/" target="_blank">choosing suitable fonts</a>. As well as being a good summary of which fonts work well in different media, it reminded me of someone recently asking about using different sized fonts &#8211; and recent experiences of unsuitable font choices.</p>
<p> I remember doing school assignments where I&#8217;d use different fancy fonts for each heading and changed the text to suit the amount of information in each section, and so on &#8211; and I was proud of being so versatile! But looking back (or at children&#8217;s work now) I can see that it looks childish and puts the focus on the fonts rather than the content. It isn&#8217;t very professional to give the impression you are trying to minimise the content!</p>
<p>As a general rule, it is better to stick to one font style and size in a single document. It is consistent which makes it easier to read (the eye doesn&#8217;t have to keep adjusting to different fonts) and it also looks clean and professional. And to be honest, it is also easier to prepare than swapping fonts all the time!</p>
<p>The common exceptions in font sizes would be:</p>
<ul>
<li>heading and sub-headings are often a little larger than the text font</li>
<li>labels on diagrams and tables are often smaller to work with the labelled items</li>
<li>the &#8216;fine print&#8217; such as a disclaimer, a copyright notice or unsubscribe information &#8211; this text can be smaller but it must still be big enough to easily read so less than 8 point is getting too small in most cases. I recently edited a document which had footnotes to a table in a 7 font and it was too small to read and also looked out of place amongst the 11 font table and general text.</li>
<li>fonts within an ad design may show more variation, but be careful to not overdo it</li>
</ul>
<p>If you are tempted to change font sizes to break up a chunk of text, consider bullet points, italics, bold, more paragraph breaks and page layout as alternatives.</p>
<p> </p>
<fb:like href='http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2008/08/font-sizes/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='recommend' colorscheme='light' font='lucida+grande'></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2008/08/font-sizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

