<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photos &#8211; no apostophe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2007/10/photos-no-apostophe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2007/10/photos-no-apostophe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 23:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tashword</title>
		<link>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2007/10/photos-no-apostophe/comment-page-1/#comment-98267</link>
		<dc:creator>tashword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2007/10/photos-no-apostophe/#comment-98267</guid>
		<description>Hi Keith,

I agree that the apostrophe in photo&#039;s could be said to represent the missing letters from photographs, but as people use the word photo and make it plural as photo&#039;s the apostrophe is generally misplaced.

Thanks for adding your comment and sharing your knowledge of grammar :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Keith,</p>
<p>I agree that the apostrophe in photo&#8217;s could be said to represent the missing letters from photographs, but as people use the word photo and make it plural as photo&#8217;s the apostrophe is generally misplaced.</p>
<p>Thanks for adding your comment and sharing your knowledge of grammar <img src='http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2007/10/photos-no-apostophe/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordconstructions.com.au/blog/2007/10/photos-no-apostophe/#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Hi, it is quite correct for the word photo&#039;s to be written using an apostrophe. This is not an apostrophe used to denote possession but indicates omission. Photo&#039;s is a shortening of the word photographs. The word photograph means light (photo) - drawing (graph) therefore to use the word photos without the apostrophe literally means &#039;lights&#039;. The omission apostrophe used in a similar circumstance would be gov&#039;t for government.   

Having said all that, it is unlikely that most people would be using the &#039; in photo&#039;s for the correct reason and in modern english usage photos has become commonly acceptable.

Regards,
Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it is quite correct for the word photo&#8217;s to be written using an apostrophe. This is not an apostrophe used to denote possession but indicates omission. Photo&#8217;s is a shortening of the word photographs. The word photograph means light (photo) &#8211; drawing (graph) therefore to use the word photos without the apostrophe literally means &#8216;lights&#8217;. The omission apostrophe used in a similar circumstance would be gov&#8217;t for government.   </p>
<p>Having said all that, it is unlikely that most people would be using the &#8216; in photo&#8217;s for the correct reason and in modern english usage photos has become commonly acceptable.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

